🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, protest has ceased to be a fundamental right. Rather, it has become a privilege that authorities grant or withhold as they see fit. This represents the underlying meaning of proposed measures that the ruling administration is advancing, which would dictate the timing and location protests can occur, with potential imprisonment for those who defy these limitations.

Erosion of Civil Liberties

Previous administrations had already undermined this essential right: the previous Tory administration had given law enforcement extensive new authorities, which global rights bodies had condemned as "serious and undue restrictions" on democratic freedoms. Collectively, these incremental attacks on liberty have effectively eliminated the hard-won right to public demonstration.

Exploiting Tragedy to Rationalize Suppression

The latest restrictive measures are being justified by referring to last week's heinous antisemitic attack on a Manchester mosque. There should be widespread consensus that the security of British Jews must be safeguarded. However, employing this atrocity as a pretext to suppress opposition is not only unrelated to that responsibility but distorts it.

"When you cannot draw the line at genocide, you probably cannot establish limits at democratic principles," observed a prominent American author, a statement that applies equally for the current government.

Historical Context of Protest

Reflect on Britain's rich history of protest and direct action against racism and authoritarianism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to after World War II Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s demonstrations against the far-right organization. Many of these historical demonstrators were labeled as radicals in their era, even while they were fighting for the freedoms of minorities.

Current Reality

In today's complicated landscape, here's what's actually happening: The Israeli government – a sovereign nation – is committing what United Nations investigations have described as systematic destruction. Its military actions have led the global justice body to release arrest warrants against Benjamin Netanyahu and his ex-military leader.

Western popular sentiment has shifted dramatically against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a large percentage of the public think Israel has likely committed international law violations. Most people would endorse a total prohibition on weapons exports to the state, and approve the detention of Netanyahu.

Silencing Dissent

Having essentially failed the argument, pro-Israel advocates are now seizing on a vile anti-Jewish attack to try to silence a mass movement against a moral catastrophe. The British government appears to be included in this effort. Government officials have not enacted extensive restrictions on Israel and have permitted arms exports to continue.

People who are demonstrating against the destruction of Gaza have been labeled as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a more extensive suppression on these protesters until now: very limited protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities minimal reason to intervene.

Problematic Association

Equating Jewish identity with the policies of the government of Israel is not only manipulative but also dangerous. The standard interpretation of antisemitism, accepted by the British government and many organizations, has been appropriately questioned for potentially restricting valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its central illustrations: that "holding Jewish people generally accountable for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've reached a point where law enforcement can propose that protests opposing Israel's policies should be canceled because they might "inadvertently or intentionally" endorse anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, government officials have declared that recognition of Palestinian statehood has made organizations "complicit" in alleged abuse faced by Jewish communities.

Double Standards

On the very day as the synagogue attack, the Israel's army killed dozens of Palestinians in Gaza – increasing the terrible count from 24 months of daily atrocities that have claimed tens of thousands of human lives. British politicians and media outlets have hardly hidden the limited value they assign to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the boldest demonstrations of racism in contemporary society.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already crossed a concerning boundary by proscribing a specific activist group, a non-violent, human rights-focused direct action organization. Multiple thousands of British protesters have been arrested, mostly for holding signs opposing mass killing and endorsing the proscribed group. Many of those arrested are elderly citizens; including a former clergyman and the child of a Holocaust survivor.

Global Comparisons

It's not difficult to see where this trajectory leads. In the United States, political leaders helped vilify demonstrations supporting Palestine: a ex-political leader suggested that some were "linked with" other nations, while the current president characterized such protests as antisemitic. In taking these actions, they helped legitimize the authoritarian crackdown on such protests – and on freedom of expression in general.

Future Concerns

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be given sweeping powers to suppress dissent. What might a new administration do with this repressive toolkit? Our forebears fought, suffered and sacrificed their lives to secure our freedoms. We may eventually rue how casually we permitted them to slip away.